121 Wash. 2d 787 - State v. Hammond’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently November 2015
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hayes v. Lockhart · Phelps Dodge Corp. v. AFL-CIO Joint Negotiating Committee · Crosby v. United States · 106 Wash. 2d 514 - State v. Nordby · Travaglia v. Pennsylvania
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The defendant shall be present at the arraignment, at every stage of the trial including the empaneling of the jury and the return of the verdict, and at the imposition of sentence, except as otherwise provided by these rules, or as excused or excluded by the court for good cause shown.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the defendant’s voluntary absence after the trial has commenced in his presence shall not prevent continuing the trial to and including the return of the verdict. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is similar in all pertinent respects to the terms of the Federal Rule the United States Supreme Court found disposi-tive in Crosby.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Crafton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.