Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 Wis. 2d 282 - State v. Hinz

121 Wis. 2d 282 - State v. Hinz’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 2024

16 state decisions

8019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Security Industrial Bank · 94 Wis. 2d 153 - County of Columbia v. Bylewski · 108 Wis. 2d 723 - State v. Alsteen · 86 Wis. 2d 459 - State v. Wollman · Keplin v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[r]ecords, reports, statements, or data compilations, in any form, of public offices or agencies, setting forth. . .matters observed pursuant to a duty imposed by law, or.. .factual findings resulting from an investigation made pursuant to authority granted by law, unless the sources of information or other circumstances indicate lack of trustworthiness.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “0.1 grams or more of alcohol in 210 liters of the person's breath is prima facie evidence that he or she was under the influence of an intoxicant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice . . ..”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.