121 Wis. 2d 459 - State v. Gustafson’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2014
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Elrod v. Burns · Giles v. State of Maryland · National Mut Ins Co of District of Columbia v. Tidewater Transfer Co Inc · 119 Wis. 2d 676 - State v. Gustafson · Frame v. Plumb
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a majority must agree on some one specific ground of error fatal to the judgment, or the judgment must be affirmed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“would result in reversals without adequate guidance to the trial court upon a new hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.