Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 122 CAL 486 - People v. Dole

People v. Dole’s Empirical Analysis

1898

Citation profile

150
cited by 150 later decisions
12
states following
April 2008
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 136 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 150 later decisions — most recently April 2008 · most notably 35 Cal. 3d 547 - People v. Beeman (1984), 19 Cal. 3d 835 - People v. Gainer (1977)

9 federal appellate · 136 state decisions — followed in 12 states

260189819001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Cronin · People v. Gallagher · Commonwealth v. McDermott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 150 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Kotwithstanding you may believe that some of the entrymen may, at the time they made their entries, have had an intention not to live on the land embraced therein, the fact that they had no intention to live thereon is not material for your consideration in determining whether or not the defendants were acting fraudulently, unless you find that such intention not to live on the land was actually known to the defendants before or at the time such entry was made. It is not sufficient for you to surmise or suspect such knowledge on their, part, but you must be satisfied from the evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendants had such actual knowledge at the time such entries were made.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.