Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

122 Cal. 72

Coonan v. Loewenthal

California Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1898

California Supreme Court · decided 1898-09-02

MOTIOU to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County and from an order denying a new trial. E. W. Wilson, Judge. • The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1920

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1898-09-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

THE COURT.

¶1Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the undertaking on appeal was filed before the notice of appeal was served. The notice of appeal shows by indorsement that it was served, but the particular day upon which it was served does not appear thereon. The material question is, was this notice.of appeal served upon the twenty-seventh day of January, or upon the following day? Upon this question the affidavits of various parties wbo were acquainted with the fact are before the court. Those affidavits squarely contradict each other, and under such circumstances we will not order the appeal dismissed.

¶2The motion to dismiss is denied.

/122/cal/72 · .json · Public domain