122 Cal. App. 35 - Fox v. Ravera’s Empirical Analysis
1932
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1951
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Dullanty v. Smith · 28 Cal. App. 241 - Weaver v. Carter · 108 Cal. App. 348 - Sites v. Howrey · Jackson v. the Lactein Co. · 118 Cal. App. 238 - Klemko v. Ryer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Appellant’s criticism of this particular instruction is technically sound' but before the giving of an instruction justifies a reversal, it must appear that it prejudicially affected the rights of the complaining party.” (Citing eases.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““.’ . . if all the instructions, taken together, and not being inconsistent with each other or confusing, give to the jury a fair and just notion of the law upon the point to which they are addressed, it is sufficient.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.