Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 122 Cal. App. 4th 659 - Wright v. State

122 Cal. App. 4th 659 - Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1997E

Relies on V. C O Churner · Correction Officer Porters v. Ronald Nussle · Abelleira v. District Court of Appeal · 52 Cal. 3d 65 - Rojo v. Kliger · 27 Cal. 4th 1112 - Zelig v. County of Los Angeles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he utility of the department's factfinding expertise exists even when the plaintiff's requested relief is unavailable through the administrative process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “( Zelig v. County of Los Angeles (2002) 27 Cal.4th 1112 , 1126, 119 Cal.Rptr.2d 709 , 45 P.3d 1171 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.