MacArthur v. Presto’s Empirical Analysis
1950
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently February 1986 · most notably Whitesides v. Council of Cheyenne (1957), Ross v. Fire and Police Pension Ass'n (1986)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Van DeVegt v. Board of County Commissioners · Board of County Commissioners v. Buckley · MacArthur v. Sierota
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Of a certainty the evidence disclosed by the record contains no showing that the necessity for spirituous liquors with meals [as in the present case] was so urgent and immediate in that community that all reasonable men must agree that it required the service of such liquors at a location across the street from an eating place having such license * * *. All reasonable doubt must be resolved in favor of the licensing authority.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Geer v. Stathopulos““The showing in the record of the existence of so many licensed restaurants and liquor stores in the vicinity is potent evidence to support the finding that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood had been met and that the denial of a license was not capricious or arbitrary.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Schooley v. Hamilton“The question now before us is not as to whether there was any evidence to support the decision of the trial court, but rather whether there was any evidence to support the decision of the licensing authority, or whether he acted arbitrarily and capriciously.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Geer v. Stathopulos
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.