122 Conn. App. 729 - State v. Pires’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Faretta v. California · Griffin v. California · State v. Golding · Connecticut v. Johnson · American Petrofina Co. v. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union Local No. 4-23
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the words 'engage in conduct' refer not to the required intent but rather explain that the person being aided by the accessory must be doing the action that constitutes the crime, as opposed to simply thinking about the criminal act or perhaps engaging in conduct other than the criminal act”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a person acts intentionally with respect to a result when his conscious objective is to cause such result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.