Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 122 F.1d 101 - In re Saur

In re Saur’s Empirical Analysis

122 F. 101 · 1903

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
January 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 2019

1 federal appellate · 3 district ·

20190319101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The reasoning of the referee in this case appears, at first view, quite plausible. A trustee defending a reclamation proceeding apparently occupies quite a different relation toward the reclaiming creditor from what he does toward the body of general creditors. But I think, upon consideration, that the provisions of sections 47 and 49 of the Bankruptcy Act * * * give any person interested in any bankrupt estate an absolute statutory right to the inspection of all accounts and papers of the trustee, and to be furnished with any information concerning the bankrupt estate which the trustee has.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The provisions of the Bankruptcy Act invoked, “broad as they are, should not be construed to require the divulgenee to a claimant against the general estate of information which might tend to its detriment or depletion.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Trustees shall “furnish such information concerning the estates of which they are trustees and their administration as may be requested by the parties in interest.” Comp. St. 1916, § 9631.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.