Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

122 F. 1021

Docket No. 460.

Read v. Hale

First Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 17, 1903.)

First Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1903-04-17

<p>In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Rhode Island.</p>

2 counsel of record

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1903-04-17

¶1In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Rhode Island.

¶2Lewis S. Dabney and Cyrus M. Van Slyck (Charles C. Mumford, on the brief), for plaintiff in error.

¶3M. H. Boutelle (Robert W. Burbank and Eben Winthrop Freeman, on the brief), for defendant in error.

¶4Before COLT, Circuit Judge, and ALDRICH and HALE, District Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6This case is governed by the conclusion reached in Tyler v. Hale, Receiver, infra, in which a per curiam opinion was handed down this day. The judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed, and the case iS remanded to that court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

/122/f1d/1021 · .json · Public domain