¶1In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.
¶2See 115 Fed. 833.
¶3Hernán W. Chaplin (John P. Wyman on the brief), for plaintiff in error.
¶4M. H. Boutelle (William E. Hale and Eben Winthrop Freeman, on the brief), for defendant in error.
¶5Before COLT, Circuit Judge, and ALDRICH and BROWN, District Judges.
¶7The record in this case raises the fundamental question of the right of a receiver of this class to institute and maintain proceedings in a foreign jurisdiction to enforce stockholder liability. That precise question has been determined adversely to such right by the Supreme Court. Hale v. Allinson (decided January 19, 1903) 23 Sup. Ct. 244, 47 L. Ed. —. We must accept such determination of the question by the Supreme Court as authoritatively controlling here. The judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed, and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.