Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 122 F.1d 609 - Esterly v. Rua

Esterly v. Rua’s Empirical Analysis

122 F. 609 · 1903

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
November 1929
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Ferris v. Higley · Grape Creek Coal Co. v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. · Pearce v. Calhoun · Van Petten v. Richardson · State ex rel. Richardson v. Withrow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But if, indeed, the appellee were, under the Code of Alaska, required to resort to a court of equity to establish the fact of the copartnership and his claim against it, the proceedings which were had in the District Court would fully answer the requirements of such a suit. The petition of the appellee contained all the necessary averments of a bill in equity. The court had jurisdiction of such a suit. The appellant answered, and the issues raised on the petition and the answer were tried by the court on the evidence which was adduced. The order and judgment of the court thereon may be regarded as a decree establishing the right and the claim of the appellee.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.