Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

122 F.2d 201

Docket No. 7600.

Bache v. United States

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued May 6, 1941.

Decided June 2, 1941.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1941-06-02

2 counsel of record

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1941-06-02

¶1James R. Kirkland, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

¶2Edward M. Curran, U. S. Atty., and Arthur J. McLaughlin, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

¶3Before GRONER, Chief Justice, and MILLER and VINSON, Associate Justices.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Appellant was convicted in the court below of robbery and sentenced to three to ten years’ confinement. The District Court appointed James R. Kirkland, Esq., an experienced counselor at this bar, to represent appellant on this appeal.

¶6We have gone carefully over the record, and we find that the so-called bill of exceptions contains no exceptions taken to any ruling of the court in the trial, and an examination of-the bill satisfies us-the trial was in all respects fair. Mr. Kirkland, after laborious work to discover some proper ground on which to urge a reversal, has frankly stated that his conclusion is that there is nothing for this court now to review. The judgment of the court below is, therefore, affirmed.

¶7Affirmed.

/122/f2d/201 · .json · Public domain