Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 122 F.2d 306 - Glade v. Walgreen Co.

Glade v. Walgreen Co.’s Empirical Analysis

122 F.2d 306 · 1941

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
April 1974
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 1974

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

1001941195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lincoln Engineering Co of Illinois v. Stewart-Warner Corporation · Boston Pneumatic Power Co. v. Eureka Patents Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We find nothing in the statute, or in the decisions cited, which would preclude plaintiff from receiving a patent for a combination, even though it produced the same result as other such devices, if it produced that result with fewer elements that had theretofore been used or thought necessary. This is precisely what plaintiff did. Theretofore others had produced the same general result with five or more elements, whereas plaintiff produced the same general result more efficiently with three elements. It is not fair to say that Martin uses the same old elements as those before him, for there are at least two of the old elements used in prior devices which Martin does not use at all. In other words, he produces the same result in a more efficient and facile manner by making three of those old elements accomplish the same general result as five or more had theretofore done.” Since Claim 3 depends upon Claim 2,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.