Franklin v. Henry’s Empirical Analysis
122 F.3d 1270 · 1997
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2012
11 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Brecht v. Abrahamson · United States v. Cronic · Crane v. Kentucky · O'NEAL v. McAninch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The explicit testimony bore on the credibility of the only percipient witness against [the defendant]. If believed by the jury, [the defendant's] testimony would have shown [the alleged victim] capable of fantasies about her mother analogous to the charges she made against [the defendant].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“we then inquire whether it had a substantial and injurious effect on the jury's verdict. 18 A. Was a constitutional right violated? 19”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury's verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.