Taylor v. Singletary’s Empirical Analysis
122 F.3d 1390 · 1997
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2024
9 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Kyles v. Whitley · Chambers v. Mississippi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'could reasonably be taken to put the whole case in such a different light as to undermine confidence in the verdict.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“If it appears that a defendant or the government is prejudiced by a joinder of offenses or of defendants in an indictment or information or by such joinder for trial together, the court may order an election or separate trials of counts, grant a severance of defendants or provide whatever other relief justice requires.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the constitutional standard for materiality ... imposes a higher burden on the petitioner than the harmless-error standard of Brecht ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. De Lisi v. Crosby
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.