United States v. Arnous’s Empirical Analysis
122 F.3d 321 · 1997
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 2018
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 287
Relies on Liparota v. United States · Texas v. New Mexico · Connecticut National Bank v. Germain · United States v. Lee · United States v. Steele
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hen food stamp coupons are exchanged for cash or unauthorized products, the coupons are diverted from their intended use-the purchase of specified food products. The loss caused by the defendant's conduct under such circumstances is the face value of the coupons exchanged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.