Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 122 F.3d 720 - Dyer v. Calderon

Dyer v. Calderon’s Empirical Analysis

122 F.3d 720 · 1997

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
September 2015
most recently cited

12 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently September 2015

12 federal appellate ·

150199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2261 (§ 107 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Kotteakos v. United States · Townsend v. Sain · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Estelle v. McGuire

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The test has nothing to do with what the best lawyers would have done. Nor is the test even what most good lawyers would have done. We ask only whether some reasonable lawyer at the trial could have acted, in the circumstances, as defense counsel acted at trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “I didn’t have time to rack my brain to remember every time my car or house had been burglarized and it didn’t have a bearing on the case to me because if you live in Oakland, I don’t know of anyone who lives in Oakland who has never been burglarized.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “13. Have you or any of your relatives or close friends ever been the victim of any type of crime? ... 15. Have you or any of your relatives or close friends ever been accused of any offense other than traffic cases?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.