Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 122 F.3d 820 - Barnes v. Logan

Barnes v. Logan’s Empirical Analysis

122 F.3d 820 · 1997

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
4
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 5 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently January 2020 · most notably Williams v. Cigna Financial Advisors Inc. (1999), Montes v. Shearson Lehman Bros. (1997)

14 federal appellate · 5 district · 5 state decisions

2601997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 9 U.S.C. § 9

Relies on First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan · BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore · Volt Information Sciences Inc v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University · Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc. · Kruso v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “review the confirmation or vacation of an arbitration award like any other district court decision ... accepting findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous but deciding questions of law de novo.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We review the [arbitration] [p]anel’s award mindful that confirmation is required even in the face of erroneous misinterpretations of law. It is not even enough that the [p]anel may have failed to understand or apply the law. An arbitrator’s decision must be upheld unless it is completely irrational, or it constitutes a manifest disregard of the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “an award must be confirmed if the arbitrators even arguably construed or applied the contract and acted within the scope of their authority.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.