Richmond v. Embry’s Empirical Analysis
122 F.3d 866 · 1997
Citation profile
46 federal appellate · 4 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably United States v. McVeigh (1998), John Joseph Romano v. Gary Gibson Warden of the Oklahoma State Penitentiary (2001)
46 federal appellate · 4 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · United States v. Bagley · United States v. Agurs · Delaware v. Van Arsdall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[e]vidence is material if its suppression might have affected the trial’s outcome”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ellis v. Mullin · Ellis v. Mullin“we examine whether the excluded testimony was material whether it was of such an exculpatory nature that its exclusion affected the trial's outcome.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“fundamental element of due process of law.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.