McKinney v. Earls

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided February 16, 2005

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2005-02-16

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2005

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-02-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM:

¶1Don McKinney appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McKinney v. Earls, No. CA-03-153-2 (W.D.Va. June 26, 2004). We deny McKinney’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2AFFIRMED