Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

122 F. App'x 40

Mitike v. Gonzales

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided February 16, 2005

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2005-02-16

Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Doherty

Decided 2005-02-16

PER CURIAM:

¶1Lemlem Siemegn Mitike, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reconsider its denial of her motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion. See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2PETITION DENIED

/122/fappx/40 · .json · Public domain