Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

122 F. App'x 65

Williams v. Farrior

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided February 24, 2005

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2005-02-24

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics

Decided 2005-02-24

PER CURIAM:

¶1Keenan M. Williams appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in Williams’ action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of *66Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Williams v. Farrior, No. CA-03-519-1 (E.D.Va. Sept. 20, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2AFFIRMED

/122/fappx/65 · .json · Public domain