Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 122 IND 31 - Fisher v. Tuller

Fisher v. Tuller’s Empirical Analysis

1890

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
4
states following
July 1981
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently July 1981 · most notably 135 Ind. App. 60 - Donnella, Admrx. v. Crady (1962), Bartlett v. Manor (1897)

4 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

901890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dodge v. Pope · First Massachusetts Turnpike Corp. v. Field · West v. Wright · Bristol v. Braidwood · Ware v. State ex rel. Long

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The right of the appellant to prosecute, an action against the appellee is statutory. * * * We can see no escape from the plain language of this statute, ¡s * * rpjjg statute which gives the right contains its own limitations, and we can ingraft no exceptions upon it. * * * If there were a, common-law right to hold the heir liable for Ihe debts of an ancestor, there might be some plausibility in appellant’s argument, but there is no such common-law rigid. Woerner, Adm’n, § 574, The appellant must therefore take the statutory right as it is bestowed, for he has no other.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Sec. 2442. The heirs, devisees and distributees of a decedent shall be liable, to the extent of the property received by them from such decedent’s estate, to any creditor whose claim remains unpaid, who, six months prior to such final settlement, was insane, an infant or out of the state; but such suit must be brought within one year after the disability is removed: provided, that suit upon the claim of any creditor out of the state may be brought within two years after such final settlement.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.