122 Ind. App. 217 - Coyle v. State

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 1976

11 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

¶1ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Wiltrout, P. J.

¶2Appellee has filed its petition for rehearing, unsupported by a brief, in which it claims that the original opinion in this case erroneously holds that juvenile courts are bound by strict rules of criminal procedure as prescribed by law for the prosecution of adults. We do not find this subject discussed in the opinion. We gather that appellee is complaining of our statement to the effect that in an adversary proceeding such as this the trial judge may not properly serve both as judge and as .advocate for one of the adversaries. We perceive no reason to alter this statement.

¶3Appellee correctly points out that the Acts of 1945, ch. 356, p. 1724; Burns’ 1942 Replacement (1951 Supp.), §§9-3201 et seq., does not contain a provision that it is to be construed as supplemental to and in furtherance of the laws affected thereby, but that this provision is *222contained in the Acts of 1947, ch. 241, §2, p. 983, which amends §19 of the 1945 Act.

¶4Petition for rehearing denied.

¶5Note. — Reported in 101 N. E. 2d 819.