State v. Banta’s Empirical Analysis
1908
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 1973
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State ex rel. Ribbeck v. Foster · 37 La. Ann. 253 - State ex rel. Segura v. Judge of the Twenty-First Judicial District · State ex rel. Tyrrell v. Judge of the Fifteenth Judicial District Court · President of the Roman Catholic Church of Ascension v. Perché · State ex rel. Hogsett v. Patin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Any judge may be recused or may recuse himself in criminal cases: “First. If said judge be connected by blood or marriage with the accused. “Second. If said judge be related to the party injured by the accused within the fourth degree, or if he be the father-in-law, son-in-law or brother-in-law of the party injured by the accused. “Third. If said judge had been employed as prosecuting attorney, or for the defense, before his election or appointment as judge.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Nunez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.