McCleary v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1914
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 71 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently March 2014 · most notably Chisley v. State (1953), Wood v. United States (1942)
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 71 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bram v. United States · Sparf v. United States · Commonwealth v. Sturtivant · Pierce v. United States · State v. Willis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is the fundamental duty of the court in all cases to pass upon the admissibility of evidence. A confession alone constitutes no crime; it.is only evidence tending to show that a crime has been committed, and it may or may not be believed by the jury, or by the court sitting as a jury, in any particular case; but the admissibility of it as evidence to be submitted to the jury is distinctly, under the system of law prevailing with us, a question for the court.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Crank“[Confessions were not to be excluded because they were the admission of the person charged with the commission of a crime, but only where the circumstances were such under which they were made, that a reasonable presumption arises that they might have been induced by a promise or threat from one in authority and consequently were open to the objection that they might not be true.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.