Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 122 Md. App. 764 - Collins v. Morris

122 Md. App. 764 - Collins v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

2 district · 9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Soehnlein v. Pumphrey · Semmes v. Worthington · Boehm v. Boehm · Sinclair v. Weber · Standard American Homes, Inc. v. Pasadena Building Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “successful fraud [through] inducing the enforcement of contracts that were never in fact made. It is not to prevent the performance or enforcement of oral contracts that have in fact been made; it is not to create a loophole of escape for dishonest repudiators. Therefore, we should always be satisfied with "some note or memorandum" that is adequate, when considered with the admitted facts, the surrounding circumstances, and all explanatory and corroborative and rebutting evidence, to convince the court that there is no serious possibility of consummating a fraud by enforcement.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(f) Within 15 days after the contract is signed by both the vendor and purchaser, the vendor shall cause the contract to be recorded among the land records of the county where the property lies and shall mail the recorder’s receipt to the purchaser. This duty of recordation and mailing of receipt shall be written clearly or printed on the contract. Failure to do so, or to record as required under this section within the time stipulated, gives the purchaser the unconditional right to cancel the contract and to receive immediate refund of all payments and deposits made on account of or in contemplation of the contract, if the purchaser exercises the right to cancel before the vendor records the contract.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““Land installment contract” means a legally binding executory agreement under which: (1) the vendor agrees to sell an interest in property to the purchaser and the purchaser agrees to pay the purchase price in five or more subsequent payments exclusive of the down payment, if any; and (2) the vendor retains title as security for the purchaser’s obligation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.