Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 122 MICH 284 - People v. Smith

People v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1899

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1930
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1930

4 state decisions

1018991900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wildey v. Crane

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The crime is complete, under the statute, whether the intercourse is had with force or by consent. In this case the proof is conclusive that the girl consented, unless it should have been found that she did not possess sufficient mind or intelligence to consent.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.