Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

122 Misc. 463

Karlin v. Pooley

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · decided 1924-02-15

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1925

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1924-02-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1As the jurisdiction of the Municipal Court to render judgment upon confession is specifically limited to the rendering of such judgment “ in an action ” (Mun. Ct. Code, § 6, subd. 3) as distinguished from a judgment on confession rendered in the Supreme Court “ without action ” (Civ. Prac. Act, § 540), and as no action was pending at the time of the entry of the judgment herein, it was error to deny the motion to vacate the judgment and the proceedings based thereon.

¶2Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

¶3All concur; present, Bijur, Mullan and Lydon, JJ.

¶4Ordered accordingly.

/122/misc/463 · .json · Public domain