Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 122 MOAPP 135 - Carter v. Bolster

Carter v. Bolster’s Empirical Analysis

1906

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
February 1954
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. Kenamore v. Wood · City of St. Louis v. Hill · State ex rel. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'n v. Eby · State ex rel. Jackson v. Bradley · State ex rel. Pulliam v. Fort

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The word ‘property,’ as well as ‘owner,/ may be used to convey a meaning sometimes broad and sometimes quite restricted. In its general and commonly accepted sense, ownership and property wohld necessarily imply the power of sale—jus disponendi. * * * Doubtless it may and is frequently used in a more restricted sense.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.