Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 122 MONT 425 - Benolken v. Johnson

Benolken v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
4
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently November 2025

17 state decisions

80194919501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re Estate of Trickett · In Re Estate of Hassell · Estate of Lindsay · In Re Estate of Minear · Wadsworth v. Brigham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When any testator omits to provide in his will for any of his children, or for the issue of any deceased child, unless it appears that such omission was intentional, such child or the issue of such child, must have the same share in the estate of the testator as if he had died intestate * *”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “I hereby give and bequeath unto each of my heirs at law not elsewhere herein mentioned or provided for, the sum of $1”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.