122 N.C. App. 298 - State v. Dial’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably 145 N.C. App. 570 - State v. Harris (2001), 185 N.C. App. 408 - State v. Freeman (2007)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Granito v. United States · Anthony v. United States · Sealfon v. United States · State v. Hennis · Connors v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the parties are the same; (2) the issue as to jurisdiction is the same; (3) the issue was raised and actually litigated in the prior action; (4) jurisdiction was material and relevant to the disposition of the prior action; and (5) the determination as to jurisdiction was necessary and essential to the resulting judgment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“An abuse of discretion occurs 'only upon a showing that the judge's ruling was so arbitrary that it could not have been the result of a reasoned decision.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The question before us, then, is whether the trial court’s acceptance of the jury’s special verdict finding that North Carolina has jurisdiction at defendant’s first trial, prior to declaring a mistrial by reason of the jury’s inability to agree upon the issue of guilt or innocence, precludes defendant from relitigating jurisdiction at his second trial. The question is apparently one of first impression. We believe, however, that it is resolved by application of the settled principles of res judicata and collateral estoppel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.