Estes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently October 2024
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Blockburger v. United States · Crawford v. Washington · Estelle v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To determine the existence of a lesser-included offense, this court looks to whether the offense in question cannot be committed without committing the lesser offense.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“As [the defendant] obtained the police report during discovery, he had the opportunity to cross-examine [the victim] on the report's contents . . .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“requires proof of a fact that the other does not.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.