Thomas v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 2022
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Leonard v. State · Kaczmarek v. State · Gallego v. State · Byford v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“evidence would be received by the jury during voir dire without context or instruction from the court as to its proper use. 11 Chaparro has not shown that the district court abused its discretion or that he was prejudiced. The district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing testimony on inconclusive DNA evidence The pair of tights L.L. wore during the incident were examined for DNA evidence. The results were inconclusive, showing a mixture of DNA for which no person could be excluded. Chaparro argues that the district court abused its discretion in admitting the evidence because the results were inconclusive and could not have any effect on the probability that he digitally penetrated L.L. Again, when reviewing a district court's decision to admit evidence, this court reviews "for an abuse of discretion or manifest error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“sexual offense under NRS 48.045(3) and NRS 179D.097, as was the conviction in the 2011 case. This court reviews a district court's decision to admit evidence "for an abuse of discretion or manifest error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“extenuat[e] or reduc[e] the degree of the Defendant's moral culpability,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Watson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.