Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 2026
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Garner v. State · Gallego v. State · Domingues v. State · Hernandez v. State · State v. Catanio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]ntent need not be proved by positive or direct evidence, but may be inferred from the conduct of the parties and the other facts and circumstances disclosed by the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Intention is manifested by the circumstances connected with the perpetration of the offense, and the sound mind and discretion of the person accused.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“rule of lenity [is a rule of construction that] demands that ambiguities in criminal statutes be liberally interpreted in the accused's favor,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lucero
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.