State v. Settle’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
63 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably State v. Ball (1983), State v. Hill (1996)
63 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Simmons v. United States · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Rakas v. Illinois · Jones v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Every subject hath a right to be secure from all unreasonable searches and seizures of his person, his houses, his papers, and all his possessions. Therefore, all warrants to search suspected places . . . are contrary to this right, if the cause or foundation of them be not previously supported by oath or affirmation;... and no warrant ought to be issued . . . [except] with the formalities, prescribed by law.””
6 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ball · State v. Sidebotham“[w]e are convinced that the language of our constitution requires that `automatic standing' be afforded to all persons within the State of New Hampshire who are charged with crimes in which possession of any article or thing is an element”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kypreos · State v. Taua“the automatic standing rule ... offers several benefits to the sound administration of criminal justice,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Tau'a · State v. Taua
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.