LaMure v. Peters’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2 district · 29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently May 2021 · most notably John Kohl & Co. PC v. Dearborn & Ewing (1998), Duncan v. Campbell (1997)
2 district · 29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Riley v. Presnell · In re Vey · Carvell v. Bottoms · Koenig v. Perez · State v. Wilson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the client discovers, or through reasonable diligence should discover, the facts essential to the cause of action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that the point of discovery in accountant malpractice cases is the receipt of the [statutory ] deficiency notice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the loss of a right, remedy, or interest,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.