State v. Martinez’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
100 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 100 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably 1 N.M. Ct. App. 535 - State v. Tollardo (2012), State v. Jacobs (2000)
100 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Davis v. Alaska · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Nagac v. Derwinski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[f]ailure to renew at trial a motion concerning an evidentiary matter which has been denied in limine does not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Jacobs · State v. Ervin“[a] jury ... should be able to take into consideration whether a witness hoped to curry favor by cooperating with the prosecution.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A defendant's right to cross-examine witnesses concerning bias or motivation to fabricate favorable testimony does not hinge on whether in fact any such deals or understandings were effected.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Silva
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.