Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 122 N.M. 537 - Ciup v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.

Ciup v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
3
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

6 district · 79 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably Herrera Ex Rel. Estate of Ruiz v. Quality Pontiac (2003), Handmaker v. Henney (1999)

6 district · 79 state decisions

530199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Key v. Chrysler Motors Corp. · Torres v. State · Koenig v. Perez · Lopez Ex Rel. Lopez v. Maez · Continental Potash, Inc. v. Freeport-McMoran, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As a general rule, a person does not have a duty to protect another from harm caused by the criminal acts of third persons unless the person has a special relationship with the other giving rise to a duty.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A movant for summary judgment need only make a prima facie showing that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that on the undisputed material facts, judgment is appropriate as a matter of law; the burden then shifts to the opponent to show at least a reasonable doubt, rather than a slight doubt, as to the existence of a genuine issue of fact.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.