Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 122 N.M. 596 - State v. Yarborough

State v. Yarborough’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
2
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

82 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably State v. Salazar (1997), State v. Cleve (1999)

82 state decisions

3401996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morissette v. United States · Weissbrodt v. White Mountain Apache Tribe of Arizona · McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co. · State Ex Rel. Helman v. Gallegos · Gilbert v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The contention that an injury can amount to a crime only when inflicted by intention is no provincial or transient notion. It is as universal and persistent in mature systems of law as belief in freedom of the human will and a consequent ability and duty of the normal individual to choose between good and evil.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “intended to preempt involuntary manslaughter when the predicate offense is a misdemeanor contained within the Motor Vehicle Code”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[O]nly criminal negligence may be a predicate for a felony unless another intention is clearly expressed by the legislature.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.