Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 122 N.M. 724 - State v. Brown

State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
2
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

80 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably State v. Barber (2004), State v. Baca (1997)

80 state decisions

3001996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Campos · State v. Ibn Omar-Muhammad · State v. Privett · State v. Hodges · Martinez v. Southwest Moving Specialists

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. The defendant discharged a firearm at a car full of people; 2. The defendant's act caused the death of Sunni Reza; 3. The act of the defendant was greatly dangerous to the lives of others, indicating a depraved mind without regard for human life; 4. The defendant knew that his act was greatly dangerous to the lives of others; 5. The defendant did not act in self-defense or defense of another; 6. This happened in New Mexico on or about the 31[st] day of May, 2013. A person acts with a depraved mind by intentionally engaging in outrageously reckless conduct with a depraved kind of wantonness or total indifference for the value of human life. Mere negligence or recklessness is not enough. In addition, the defendant must have a corrupt, perverted, or malicious state of mind, such as when a person acts with ill will, hatred, spite, or evil intent. Whether a person acted with a depraved mind may be inferred from all the facts and circumstances of the case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “1. Sufficient Evidence Supports the Jury’s Finding that Defendant Possessed Subjective Knowledge that His Conduct Was “Greatly Dangerous to the Lives of Others.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.