122 Ohio App. 3d 430 - State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “for a hearing so that a record can be developed as to the nature of the defendant's participation in the [drug treatment] program and a determination of whether he was `confined' for purposes of the statute.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Keeton, Unpublished Decision (5-19-2005)

2. “`must review the nature of the program to determine whether the restrictions on the participants are so stringent as to constitute `confinement' as contemplated by the legislature.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Keeton, Unpublished Decision (5-19-2005)