Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 122 Ohio App. 3d 626 - State v. Cloud

122 Ohio App. 3d 626 - State v. Cloud’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently October 2025 · most notably 131 Ohio App. 3d 387 - State v. Brown (1998), 140 Ohio App. 3d 81 - State v. Smith (2000)

34 state decisions

1901997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fex v. Michigan · State v. Pachay · State v. Cross · State v. Mourey · 70 Ohio App. 3d 440 - State v. Black

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “for good cause shown in open court, with the prisoner or his counsel present.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Cleveland v. Branham, Unpublished Decision (3-24-2005) · State v. Shepherd, Unpublished Decision (8-18-2006)
  2. “The written notice and request for final disposition shall be given or sent by the prisoner to the warden or superintendent having custody of him, who shall promptly forward it with the certificate to the appropriate prosecuting attorney and court by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Cleveland v. Branham, Unpublished Decision (3-24-2005) · State v. Siniard, Unpublished Decision (3-5-2004)
  3. “If the action is not brought to trial within the time provided, subject to continuance allowed pursuant to this section, no court any longer has jurisdiction thereof, the indictment, information, or complaint is void, and the court shall enter an order dismissing the action with prejudice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Shepherd, Unpublished Decision (9-30-2004)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.