Collinson v. Threadgill’s Empirical Analysis
1926
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1938
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Cannon v. Robinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It fails to appear that any of the papers, either incident to the guardianship, or any of the ether papers incident to the application for the allowance to the appellant, Col-linson, were ever served upon the Superintendent of the Osage Indian Reservation.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Shimonek v. Tillman““* * * And said Superintendent is authorized, whenever the interests of the allottee require, to appear in the county court for the piotection of the interests of the allottee. * * *"”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Shimonek v. Tillman““* * A copy of all papers filed in the comity court shall be served on the Superintendent of the Osage Agency at the time of filing. * * *””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Shimonek v. Tillman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.