Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 122 Okla. 4 - White v. Infield

White v. Infield’s Empirical Analysis

1926

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 1998
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 1998

10 state decisions

5019261930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Lamb & Tyner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We cannot concede that the reasoning on which this conclusion is based has any application to the instant case, for here we find that at the time of the passage of this so-called local statute, _ confined in its effect solely to Ellis county,’ there was a general statute effective in all the counties of the state, including Ellis county, prescribing when county assessors should be elected and their term of office; so, if we should undertake to resort to the adjudication of the Legislature as to the necessity of a special act and hold that adjudication is controlling, we find that the Legislature had long since adjudged that the general act could be made applicable to the subject-matter before the legislative body.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.