Bunte v. Hasley’s Empirical Analysis
1926
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 1996
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Daniel v. Tolon · Hayden v. Dannenberg · Stewart v. Harris · Voris v. Robbins · Miller v. Nanny
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(1) It must be conceded, as contended by the plaintiffs, that a court of equity in a property case will by decree establish an oral contract relating to real estate, the result of the establishment of which will be that the real estate be declared to be held in trust for the use and benefit of those with whom the contract was made, but where such contract is alleged to exist solely by reason of oral conversations, the same must be established by evidence clear, unequivocal, and decisive. Miller v. Nanny, 91 Okl. 150 , 216 P. 662 ; Secrest et al. v. Nobles et al., 97 Okl. 277 , 223 P. 863 ; Bernard v. McRay, 89 Okl. 1 , 213 P. 82 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ellis v. Benbrook
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.