State v. Watson’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Johnson · State v. Bourgeois · 77 Wash. 2d 94 - Washington Natural Gas Co. v. Public Utility District No. 1 · Sherman v. State · State v. Moen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Judges should accord to every person who is legally interested in a proceeding, or that person’s lawyer, full right to be heard according to law, and, except as authorized by law, neither initiate nor consider ex parte or other communications concerning a pending or impending proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Davis“`communication between counsel and the court when opposing counsel is not present.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Perala
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.