State v. Watson’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 115 Wash. 2d 171 - City of Spokane v. Douglass · 111 Wash. 2d 22 - City of Seattle v. Eze · 93 Wash. 2d 268 - State v. Dupard · United States v. Soto-Olivas · 83 Wash. 2d 405 - Standlee v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Sex offenders who committed a sex offense on, before, or after February 28, 1990, and who, on or after July 28, 1991, are in custody, as a result of that offense . . . must register at the time of release from custody with an official designated by the agency that has jurisdiction over the offender.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Watson · State v. Watson“[a] reasonable person would understand that later restraint based on probation violations was a continuing consequence of the original offense,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Watson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.